http://pender.ee.upenn.edu/~rabii/toes/

Go back to TOES-USA Press

Go to The Peoples' Summit/TOES '97 Home Page


The Peoples' Summit/TOES '97 - Denver:
The OTHER Economic Summit, June 20 - 22, 1997
"Working Alternatives: A World That Works"


National & International Press Coverage
for The Peoples' Summit/TOES '97 - Denver

(Last updated 1/15/98)

Table of Contents

  1. Winter, 1997, Yes! A Journal of Positive Futures: p. 52.
    "The Other Economic Summit"
    By Susan Hunt

  2. May/June 1997, Dollars and Sense
    "Moving Mountains: The counter-summit confronts the G-7"
    By Andrew Parkin

  3. May 16, 1997, American Political Network, Inc.: Greenwire
    ("Media Monitor" Section)
    "Conferences in June"

  4. June 18, 1997, Wednesday, USA Today
    ("News" Section: p. 8A)
    "Summit aims for a Rocky Mountain high: Denver to host the world's economic giants"
    By Patrick O'Driscoll

  5. June 19, 1997, Agence France Presse
    (Section: Domestic, non-Washington, general news item)
    "On sidelines of G8, protesters plan summit of their own"

  6. June 19, 1997, Thursday, Inter Press Service
    "G-7 Environment: Indigenous Tribunal to Try Summiteers"

  7. June 19, 1997, Thursday, San Jose CA, Mercury News
    "G-7 Out of Touch with Global Reality"
    By Bill Ferguson

  8. June 20, 1997, Friday, Tokyo, Japan Shukan ST
    (a weekly newspaper published by the Japan Times for people studying English)
    "The Other Summit"
    By Douglas Lummis

  9. June 20, 1997, Friday, Las Cruces Sun News, page B6
    "Free Trade"
    By Erik Leaver

  10. June 20, 1997, Friday, The Irish Times, (City Edition)
    ("Sport" Section: Supplement Page 4)
    "Summit party in mile high city"
    By Joe Carroll

  11. June 21, 1997, Saturday ("News" Section, p. 18A), The Dallas Morning News
    "Business as usual for most in Denver"
    By Edward Dufner, Staff Writer of The Dallas Morning News

  12. June 23, 1997, Monday (International section), New York Times
    Reporter's Notebook: "Calling All Causes"

  13. June 30, 1997, (Outlook Section, p. 13), U.S. News & World Report
    The Other Economic Summit
    By Patty Cantrell

  14. July 7, 1997, The Nation
    Editorial on the G-7 Summit
    By Doug Henwood, the Editor of Left Business Observer

  15. July 18, 1997, Friday, Tokyo, Japan, Shukan ST
    (a weekly newspaper published by the Japan Times for people studying English)
    Biopiracy
    By Douglas Lummis

Back to Top of Table of Contents


National & International Press Clippings


Winter, 1997, Yes! A Journal of Positive Futures: p. 52.

"The Other Economic Summit"

By Susan Hunt

When leaders of the industrialized world meeti Denver this summer, TOES willl be there, too. Susan Hunt has a preview:

Every summer, in either June or July, the heads of state of seven of the largest industrialized countries -- Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, Japan, and the United States -- come together to work on the world's economy. This meeting of the "Group of Seven" is called the G-7 Economic Summit. This summer, the United States will host the 1997 G-7 Economic Summit in Denver on June 20-22, 1997.

Not surprisingly, local people in the city hosting the G-7 Summit traditionally take this opportunity to organize numerous side-summits to work on the economic issues that are important to them. The first such popular summit was held in 1981 in Ottawa. TOES (The Other Economic Summit) itself was first held in London, and has been continuing ever since.

The TOES theme this year in Denver will be "Working Alternatives: A World that Works." It will be a celebration of the incredibly innovative economic solutions citizens' groups everywhere have invented in response to their own economic problems.

This is ot the economic theory that has driven the last 50 years of disastrous World Bank lending for projects, 40 percent of which, by the Bank's own reckoning, have made people worse off than they were before.

TOES '97 - Denver is a showcase for projects that make people and communities better off, that provide good, meaningful work, support community and enhance quality of life, protect and clean up the environment, that work. It is an opportunity for people and communities not only to share the results of their own efforts, but to stand back and see how they fit into the huge mosaic made up of similar efforts not only in the US, but in all North America and around the world.

For an overview of TOES, information about how to organize your part of theprogram, a list of people to contact, and some of the vast output of past TOES summits going back to 1984, look at the TOES97 home page: http://pender.ee.upenn.edu/~rabii/toes/. TOES '97 may also be contacted by regular mail: TOES-USA, 777 UN Plaza, Suite 3C, New York, NY 10017; and e-mail: TOES97@igc.apc.org.

Back to Table of Contents


May/June 1997, Dollars and Sense

Moving Mountains: The counter-summit confronts the G-7

By Andrew Parkin

This coming June, the city of Denver will play host to the world's most expensive photo-opportunity: the G-7 Summit. Watched by 5,000 journalists, and costing over $11 million, the leaders of the seven major industrialized economies (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States) will gather for some sight-seeing and a few banquets before retreating to a private conference room where they will pretend to solve the world's problems.

The G-7, however, will not be the only show in town. Lurking behind it will be TOES '97 _ The Other Economic Summit _ a showcase for progressive solutions to the crises of unemployment, poverty, and environmental degradation. According to Trent Schroyer, chair of the TOES '97 program committee, this counter-summit provides a democratic alternative to the G-7's closed-door, top-down approach to managing the global economy.

As a group, the seven nations which form the G-7 have enormous economic power. Their combined gross domestic product of $16 trillion represents almost 70% of global economic output. This disproportionate economic clout makes the G-7 the closest thing we have to an institution of global governance, at least as far as economic issues are concerned. The G-7 nations call most of the shots within international economic bodies such as the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and the World Trade Organization. The annual meeting of G-7 leaders gives them a chance to coordinate their response to the international financial crisis of the day, such as the 1989 stock market crash, the collapse of the Mexican peso several years later, or the restructuring of the Russian economy.

What is most striking about the G-7, however, is its inability to address the serious problems of persistently high unemployment, growing social inequality, and the continuing destruction of the environment. It denies the existence of a crisis. In 1996, for instance, the G-7 leaders asserted that within the G-7 "the economic fundamentals remain sound and well-oriented" and that globally "economic prospects also look very encouraging."

But in 1995, over 22 million people were unemployed in the G-7 countries. Youth unemployment is particularly severe, topping 12% in the United States, 15% in the United Kingdom and Canada, 25% in France and 30% in Italy. At the same time, despite the fact that the global economy has been growing, the United Nations reports that "the gulf between the poor and rich of the world has widened even further." Figures cited in the U.N.'s Human Development Report for 1996 show that in the last 30 years, the poorest 20% of the world's people saw their share of global income fall from 2.3% to 1.4%, while the richest 20% saw their share increase from 70% to 85%. This means that the ratio of the income of the richest fifth of the global population to that of the poorest fifth more than doubled during this period, from 30-to-1 to 61-to-1.

The response by the G-7 to this crisis has been predictable and uninspired. The main economic policies the G-7 leaders have agreed upon at recent summits have been reducing government spending, deregulating labor markets, and liberalizing trade.

Even such conservative institutions as the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development have begun to doubt the wisdom of these policies. Its secretary-general fears "a system of upheaval may occur if those countries continue down the path of wealth-generation through further and further market liberalization, while providing less and less government action to safeguard social stability."

On the environmental front, the performance of the G-7 might appear more respectable. The 1995 Summit undertook to recycle all of its own waste - from leftover briefing papers to used coffee cups - and in 1996 G-7 environment ministers invited input from environmentalist non-governmental organizations. But the G-7's green pretensions have not been matched by the actions of its member governments.

At the Halifax summit in 1995, the seven leaders committed themselves to fulfilling the promise made by all industrialized countries at the 1992 Rio Summit to level off the emission of carbon dioxide gas (CO2), so that emissions would be no higher in the year 2000 than they were in 1990. Yet it has become clear that none of the G-7 countries is on track to meeting the Rio target. The combined CO2 emissions of Western countries actually grew by 4% between 1990 and 1995 and the G-7 countries alone produce 40% of the world's total.

If the G-7 leaders were really interested in finding solutions to their economic and environmental problems, they wouldn't have far to look. In most years since the first "Popular Summit" took place in Ottawa in 1980, a counter-summit has been held in the same city as the G-7 Summit. The purpose of the counter-summits is partly constructive (to put forward policy alternatives, or as TOES '97 phrases it, to define "an economics as if people mattered"), and partly disruptive: to bite at the heels of the G-7 itself. Said one organizer of the counter-summits' message to the G-7: "We're dogging you, we're shadowing you. We are a fly in your face!"

Each counter-summit has been unique, drawing together international non-governmental organizations and local networks of activists, and linking global issues with local concerns. Some have adopted an academic format, based on lectures and workshops, while others - including the Halifax People's Summit in 1995 - combined workshops with protests and carnivalesque street theater and outdoor picnics. Still others have been much more confrontational, featuring large demonstrations and civil disobedience. In Toronto in 1988, 2,000 people marched in protest against the G-7 while over 100 demonstrators were arrested when they attempted to place the leaders under citizens' arrest for crimes against humanity.

This year's "other economic summit" is being organized around the theme of "Working Alternatives: A World That Works." It poses a series of open-ended questions such as "What is an ecological economics?" and "Is globalization to everyone's benefit?" Events will touch on the impact of NAFTA on Mexico, problems associated with overconsumption and Western consumer culture, and the failure of countries to live up to the promises made at the Beijing world summit on women. It also will try to show that there are alternative economic models that really do work, for instance, with a "sustainable village," demonstrating ecologically and socially sustainable products and services. From Denver, TOES organizer Emily Nichols says one of the local issues on their agenda may be corporate welfare, including local taxpayers' subsidies of expensive new sports stadiums in the area.

Counter-summits draw attention to the anti-democratic nature of the G-7 as a decision-making institution. The G-7 is essentially a private club for the world's richest nations. Its officials meet behind closed doors, and there is no single congress or parliament to whom they must answer. Although their populations amount to only 11% of the world's total, their efforts to manage the global economy affect the whole planet.

There is no room for spokespeople representing the majority of the world's population, or for the representatives of unions or environmental movements, or even for ordinary citizens, at the G-7 meeting-room table. The counter-summits, however, provide a democratic platform from which these groups can speak to the G-7's issues.

Counter-summits such as TOES '97 cannot realistically hope to directly influence the G-7, or even to grab the mass media spotlight a way from the G-7 for more than a few brief moments. Where the counter-summits hope to make their impact is at the grassroots level, among the growing network of concerned citizens and movements. It sparks public discussion and facilitates greater understanding of complex global issues, says Schroyer, and "brings together groups that need to have a greater understanding of t he global context in which they are acting locally."

By building up a tradition of counter-summits in each G-7 country, furthermore, TOES and its counterparts have begun to link together a diverse group of international social and ecological activists. This process, which is still in its early stages, is what political scientist Richard Falk calls "globalization-from-below." Falk argues that the hopes of humanity depend upon this form of democratic globalization, which provides the only "alternative scenario of the future to that of the global political economy being shaped by transnational market forces."

Back to Table of Contents


May 16, 1997, American Political Network, Inc.: Greenwire
("Media Monitor" Section)

Conferences in June: A Monthly Roundup

20-22 -- SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: Colorado activists host "The Other Economic Summit" in Denver, CO, to coincide with the "Summit of the Eight" conference. The TOES conference will focus on alternatives to the development policies of the world's seven industrialized countries and Russia. Contact: toesdc ipc.org.

Back to Table of Contents


June 18, 1997, Wednesday, USA Today
("News" Section: p. 8A)

Summit aims for a Rocky Mountain high: Denver to host the world's economic giants

By Patrick O'Driscoll

DENVER -- (article contained this paragraph on the Peoples' Summit)

An alternative " People's Summit" on downtown's Auraria Campus of three local colleges will highlight topics off the summit's agenda: human rights, women's issues, peace and immigration.

Back to Table of Contents


Agence France Presse
June 19, 1997
(Section: Domestic, non-Washington, general news item)

On sidelines of G8, protesters plan summit of their own

DENVER - As leaders of the top democracies work out the world's future in a library here this weekend, activists from a host of causes will march and hold a "People's Summit" down the street.

"The economic agenda being discussed is about our lives," said Njoki Njehu, member of a group called 50 Years is Enough: US Network for Global Economic Justice.

"Decisions must not be left to people who do not really share the interests of the majority of working people," Njehu told a local daily.

The " People's Summit," begun in Britain in 1984, has been held annually alongside the meeting of leaders representing the world's richest industrialized democracies, this year called the "Summit of the Eight."

Highlights of the alternative meetings and demonstrations include a rally Saturday in central Denver to protest sweatshops and a "march for justice" later that day.

Organizers also plan other demonstrations and marches as well as educational workshops.

(The article continues on about the Iranian demonstration.)

Back to Table of Contents


Inter Press Service
Thursday, June 19, 1997

G-7 Environment: Indigenous Tribunal to Try Sumiteers

DENVER, June 19 - The eight most powerful nations on earth are on trial at a hearing being conducted before an international panel of judges from eight nations under threat -- the Karen, Komi, Ogoni, Quichua, Mapuche, Nuxalk, Siam, and Western Shoshone indigenous nations.

The June 19-21 trial at the Central Presbyterian Church here is focussing on the environmental and human rights impact on indigenous territories of the operations of mega-corporations based in the richest countries.

The hearing has been convened to coincide with the June 20-21 "Summit of Eight" - a meeting here of the leaders of Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia, and the United States. The Summit of Eight is an expanded version of the annual meetings of the "Group of Seven" major industrialized countries. Russia is taking part in the hopes it will become a full-fledged member of the club.

No commercial map or school atlas shows the nations of origin of the judges who will weigh evidence at the hearing. Most of these nations, which represent indigenous groups with histories that predate written records, are struggling to survive, as their lands, peoples, and cultures are threatened by multinational companies based in the eight industrialized nations.

"The Universal Declaration of the Rights of Peoples, and the 27 principles proclaimed at the Earth Summit five years ago, are the primary baselines by which each country will be evaluated," says Alan O'Hashi of Global Response, a Colorado-based body that is organizing the tribunal.

Public interest activists from the eight industrialized nations have been invited to testify about the records of European oil companies, including Shell and Total; Russian gas companies, including Gaz-Prom; and Freeport McMoRan and Peabody, mining companies from the United States and Britain respectively.

Also on trial will be logging companies, including McMillan Bloedell and Interfor of Canada and Mitsubishi and Daishowa of Japan; Italian dam-building companies, including Impresit and Cogefar; and Dresdner, a German bank.

Global Response - an international network of people who work together to inundate key decision-makers with letters of protest over such issues as environmental and human rights abuses -- is not the only group that is questioning the eight world leaders here.

Also turning out in force is the British-based group, "The Other Economic Summit" (TOES) as well as "Fifty Years is Enough," a group that was created to challenge the policies of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

TOES, which has convened alternative meetings to counter the "Group of Seven" for the past 13 years, claims to "build on a tradition of theory and practice that economics, constrained by respect for the natural world and human dignity, is possible."

TOES organizer Larry Martin has told reporters that their summit will include everyone from "clinical academics" to "visceral professional activists."

Shell will be taken to task for its oil and gas exploration in Ogoni territory in Nigeria and Machiguenga territory in Peru; Unocal, for a gas pipeline on Karen lands in Burma; and Gaz Prom, for its plans to conduct explorations on the Khanty-Mansi lands in Siberia.

Activists are expected to pan Freeport for its operations on Amungme and Komoro lands in western Neo Guinea at the world's largest gold mine. And they will weigh Peabody's record on Dineh and Hopi lands in Arizona, where the company is strip-mining coal in the desert.

McMillan Bloedell and Interfor will be charged with over-exploitation of the temperate rainforests of the Nuu-Chah-Nulth and Nuxalk peoples of British Columbia in Canada. And Mitsubishi and Daishowa will be criticized for polluting the lands of the Lubicon Cree in the Canadian province of Alberta, where the two Japanese companies are logging and drilling for gas respectively.

The Italian dam-builders and Dresdner will be tried for the construction of hydro-electric projects in Latin America and Africa that have flooded the lands of the Mapuche and other indigenous peoples.

Gearing up to grab attention from the 5,000 journalists that are expected to visit the city this weekend, the TOES summit has appointed a director of guerrilla activity for the event.

"Civil disobedience is a distinct possibility," says Leslie Moody, of the Denver-based Jobs With Justice, which recently shut down a downtown street in a call for pay raises for janitors.

Back to Table of Contents


June 19, 1997, Thursday
San Jose CA Mercury News
http://www.mercurycenter.com/opinion/main/docs/g7.htm

G-7 Out of Touch with Global Reality

The presidents of the seven largest industrialized countries met June 20-22 for a major media event called the Denver Summit of the Eight, known last year as the G-7 Summit. When it's over, they will most likely issue a communique similar to last year, in which they proclaimed, "Globalization has led to a considerable expansion of wealth and prosperity in the world," and "Expanding trade and investment has led to marked increases in global wealth and prosperity."

In contrast, the United Nations last week came out with a report saying the opposite, that poverty is increasing in many countries, including the US and that any benefits of globalization is only going to the richer individuals in the world.

It's easy to see why they need to keep up the illusion of global prosperity. Otherwise their entire plan to manage the world economy could come under close scrutiny -- as it should.

There are many problems with the G-7 Summit, including the questionable legitimacy of allowing eight presidents to set the global agenda, especially since they are so out of touch with the world economy. Another especially since they are so out of touch with the world economy. Another major problem is their solution, which is more of the same; more NAFTA (expand it to Chile,) more rights for corporations and big investors (the new Multilateral Agreement on Investment,) and their thinking that increased international trade will usher in improved well-being.

The UNDP's "Human Development Report 1997 - Poverty From a Human Development Perspective" speaks clearly, "The global expansion of trade and investment is proceeding largely for the benefit of the more powerful countries in the North. The developing world has seen a widening gap between 'winners' and 'losers.' The share of the poorest 20 per cent of the world's population has shrunk from 2.3 per cent of world income in 1960 to 1.1 per cent today -- and it is still falling. Globalization is hurting poor people, and unless globalization is carefully managed, poor countries and poor people will become increasingly marginalized."

Author Richard Jolly, Special Adviser to the UNDP Administrator and principal coordinator of the report, then speaks even more directly, "All countries and all major financial and international agencies must do more than just stand cheering on the sidelines about the virtues of globalization," he says. "Globalization needs more management -- to open opportunities for the poorest countries, not close or restrict them in order to create employment and avoid greater economic disparities -- both among and within countries." Could he be speaking directly to the G-7 Summit about cheerleading for the global economy?

If the G-7 ministers decided to seek out advice, they wouldn't have far to go. Only a few blocks away a parallel summit called "Working Alternatives - A World that Works," will be a forum for the kinds of bottom-up development that benefits the poor people and protects the environment, and the type of development which is largely ignored by the G-7 ministers. As in past years, The Other Economic Summit (TOES) is organizing this alternative summit, which will have participation by people affected by globalization.

The G-7 leaders need to take off their rose-colored glasses and examine the effects of their policies on the most of the world's people. They could start by reading the UNDP report.

By Bill Ferguson
Bay Area 50 Years is Enough: US Network for Global Economic Justice
Email: 75721.1264@compuserve.com
(Copyright, since they made very minor changes, here is my original, since it's 2% different, and since I wrote it, I think that makes it mine and I give you permission to publish it and I give permission for it to be used for any politically progressive purpose.)

Back to Table of Contents


June 20, 1997, Friday
Shukan ST, Tokyo, Japan
(a weekly newspaper published by the Japan Times for people studying English)

The Other Summit

by Douglas Lummis

On the day this article is published, I will be leaving for Denver, Colorado. No, I haven't been invited to the economic summit of the G-7 (is it G-8, now that Russia has been admitted?). I'm going to a conference called The Other Economic Summit (TOES).

TOES conferences have been held every year since 1988, always in the city where the G-7 is meeting. (In 1993 it was held in Tokyo.) The first intention of these conferences is to challenge the idea that the leaders of the seven (or eight) richest and most powerful countries have the right to dictate economic policy to the world. The second is to challenge the idea that they have the ability to do so.

The theme of this year's conference is "A World that Works." The Implication is that, at present, the world is not working. Of course, this is true. Under the domination of the G-7 we are steadily moving toward cultural destruction, mass starvation and ecocatastrophe. (If you don't know this yet, please learn to read the newspaper more carefully.)

At the alternative conference there will be a different breed of people, people who see things differently, talk differently, look differently, laugh differently and dream differently from the G-7 leaders and the sycophants who surround them. Many will be from the poor countries, or from the poorer classes of the rich countries, or people of color, or indigenous people or people resisting oppression. Many in all these categories will be women.

(Here's an experiment: When you look at the TV and newspaper pictures of the G-7, count how many people there are in any of the above categories, that is, people who are not rich white men.)

When I say these people dream differently, I mean they are dreaming of a world different from the G-7 world, a world held together by something sturdier than sales, soldiers and cynicism.

As the conference title indicates, this year's meeting is not aimed at appealing to the G-7 leaders to do things differently (they won't anyway) but will consist of reports from people who are already doing things differently, people carrying out projects different from those demanded by the G-7 leaders: projects that work, can work or must work.

The two panels that I have organized are on the theme of alternatives to war. The first will include Charles Overby, founder of the Article Nine Society, which seeks to promote the principles of Japan's Peace Constitution around the world. The second will be on antibase movements and will feature reports from representatives of the anti-U.S.-base movements of Okinawa, South Korea, Panama and the Philippines (remember that the Philippine antibase movement "worked" and the U.S. bases were actually kicked out of the country).

I write about these things here because you will never read about them in the mainstream press.

Back to Table of Contents


Las Cruces Sun News, "Letters to the Editor"
June 20, 1997, Friday, page B6

Free Trade"

By Erik Leaver

As host of this year's Group of 7 (G-7) Summit on June 21-23, President Clinton will set the meeting's agenda. Clinton has proposed discussing export credit agencies, United Nations funding and reform, environmental technology, and childrens' health. As the principal purveyors, along with the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, of free trade policies and the neoliberal economic model, the time of the G-7 delegates would be better spent examining the grassroots consequences of those policies.

The growth and increasing power of global corporations, unregulated flow of capital across borders and the difficulty of fostering development under the "trickle down" economic model have contributed to increasing poverty and economic polarization throughout Africa, Latin America and much of Asia. The G-7's economic policies are not working unless you happen to be a shareholder in a multinational corporation that is profiting from falling wages in poor countries.

Clinton and his G-7 friends should take a careful look at what they have sown, not from the vantage of the seven most powerful economic units on the planet, but from the point of view of workers, farmers and small business people and manufacturers in countries from Mexico to South Africa to the Philippines.

If they fail to do so, numerous citizens' organizations, including the 50 Years is Enough Network, will be in Denver to put these issues into the limelight.

(The Interhemispheric Resource Center is a nonprofit research and analysis policy institute with offices located in Albuquerque and Silver City. The IRC is a member of the 50 Years is Enough: U.S. Network for Global Economic Justice, a coalition working to bring profound transformation of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund)

Erik Leaver, Communications Director
Interhemispheric Resource Center (IRC)
Box 4506, Albuquerque, NM 87196
tel: (505) 842-8288; fax: (505) 246-1601
email:
leaver@swcp.com or resourcectr@igc.apc.org
web: http://www.zianet.com/infocus

Back to Table of Contents


The Irish Times
June 20, 1997 (City Edition)
("Sport" Section: Supplement Page 4)

Summit party in mile high city

By Joe Carroll

ALTITUDE sickness felling the global leaders at the Summit of the 8 in the "mile high city" of Denver this week is said to be a "nightmare" for its organisers. They advise low alcohol consumption as a precaution.

The Japanese arrived early to adjust to Colorado's lower oxygen content, Summit spokeswoman said. Summit of the 8 is the new title for what used to be called the G-7 summit of the world's richest economic powers. This year Russia is being incorporated fully into the club although its faltering economy does not really warrant it.

President Boris Yeltsin will attend all the meetings except one with his colleagues from the US, Japan, Germany, France, Britain, Italy and Canada. The EU will be represented by the Dutch presidency and the EU Commission,

The US, as host nation, is gloating at presummit briefings how its economic situation has been reversed compared to previous G-7 meetings when the US used be lectured on the size of its deficit. "Today the stellar performance of the US economy will be the principal focus of economic attention," boasted Dan Tarullo, assistant to President Clinton for international economics.

The US is also hailing the modest achievements of the Russian economy under Mr Yeltsin, credit for which is also being attributed to Mr Clinton by the White House handlers.

As Mr Tarullo puts it: "With those two accomplishments in hand, we're prepared to move on to the next three tasks of strengthening our economies for the global economy of the 21st century, consolidating the new global agenda responses to international crime, international terrorism, infectious diseases and other such global problems, and integrating more nations into the community of free market democracies."

This ambitious agenda will keep the eight leaders busy as they also wine and dine in picturesque venues in the former "cow town". They will be helped by foreign ministers, finance ministers and armies of officials. A rumour that the world leaders would ride around on horses like their EU counterparts in Amsterdam did on bicycles could not be confirmed.

About 4,000, journalists will be doing their bit to tell the world what the summiteers are up to. Denver is determined to make everybody's sojourn unforgettable and the media are being promised duffel bags with such goodies as bottled water and tea bags.

But to more serious business. Africa is going to be a main item following President Clinton's launch this week of a US initiative for that continent. Key elements, are increased access to US markets through tariff reductions, debt relief for poorest nations and increased private investment up to $650 million.

China will also figure in the discussions. The Hong Kong hand over is only weeks away and the summit wants to send a strong message that the terms of the Basic Agreement must be respected. The human rights situation inside China, most favoured nation status and future: membership of the World Trade Organisation will also be discussed.

As if all that's not enough, there will be two other summits going on in Denver. One is called, "The Other Economic Summit" or the "People's Summit" and will bring together about 50 grassroots organisations to "highlight problems with economic policies that solely benefit profits over people".

The other is a Women's Summit which will focus on women's rights in the US and abroad. It will feature a "hunger banquet" to show up the feasting going on in the fancy venues such as the Fort Restaurant, noted for its buffalo, elk and beef dishes.

Back to Table of Contents


The Dallas Morning News
Saturday, June 21, 1997
("News" Section, p. 18A)

Business as usual for most in Denver

By: Edward Dufner, Staff Writer of The Dallas Morning News

DENVER - (abstract)

If anything, Denverites had a better chance of seeing the various summit hangers-on - demonstrators, reporters and the like - than actual participants.

A " Peoples' Summit '97" offered a left-leaning counterpoint to the official goings-on with more than 100 events scattered about town, including a Justice for Janitors rally. Adherents of Lyndon LaRouche hoisted placards denouncing the 1944 Bretton Woods conference, at which the International Monetary Fund was established.

Back to Table of Contents


New York TimesBR> (International section)
Monday, June 23, 1997: A8

Reporter's Notebook

Calling All Causes

The presence of about 2,000 journalists in Denver drew dozens of groups seeking a wider audience for their causes, ranging from solar power to the rights of indigenous populations to child labor exploitation in Asia.

Although speakers moved on and off the steps of the State Capitol as if on a conveyor belt, audiences were thin and reporters were rare.

At the so-called Peoples' Summit, Leslie Moody, a labor organizer, gave a workshop called "How to Organize a Demonstration." Speaking to an audience of six, Ms. Moody instructed her listeners on the prime goal of any protest: "It's all to get press."

Students of Demonstration 101 could have gleaned tips from an Iranian exile group that bused in hundreds of supporters from around North America.

"No trade, no ties, no arms to the mullahs!" chanted the Iranians, supporters of a Paris-based opposition group, the National Council of Resistance of Iran.

The demonstration included Representative Gary Ackerman, Democrat of New York, who attacked Iran's theocratic Government, saying, " You cannot he a state of God and do the devil's work."

Maryam Rajavi, the councils president, addressed the rally via satellite hookup from a guerrilla base on the Iran-Iraq border.

Seeing their leader speaking from a huge television screen in downtown Denver, the exiles responded enthusiastically, beating drums, clanging cymbals and chanting in Persian and English, "Maryam, our shining sun, we will take her to Teheran!"

The Freebie Test

Penned in at a press center here, many, if not most, reporters wrote about the summit meeting without actually seeing a real live head of state.

Pacing the windowless, subterranean White House filing center, some veteran reporters grumbled about the low level of freebies.

The nylon ditty bag given to each accredited reporter came stuffed with a road map of Colorado, a CD on Denver, a pen on a gold string, a collapsible plastic water bottle and a box of tea bags.

While professing not to care about such things, a newspaper reporter recalled the luxurious gifts given at past summit meetings. In Venice the Italians handed out silk neckties and scarves. In Lyon the French presented specially bottled win. In Halifax, Nova Scotia, the Canadians gave out sail bags. In Tokyo the Japanese gave tape recorders.

Organizers proudly report that, thanks to corporate and individual donations, the three-day affair will cost the Federal Government only about $11 million, compared with the $40 million that France reportedly spent for last year's meeting.

Back to Table of Contents


June 30, 1997
U.S. News & World Report
(Outlook Section, p. 13)

The Other Economic Summit

By Patty Cantrell

While leaders from the Summit of Eight nations (the Group of Seven plus Russia) were meeting last week in Denver, a meeting of another sort was taking place down the street. Several hundred activists gathered for the People's Summit, a loosely organized forum for activists who share the conviction that G-7 policies are at the root of many everyday problems. Among the participants were Physicians for Social Responsibility, the African Women's Economic Political Network, Presbyterians for Restoring Creation, and Citizens for Peace in Space.

They gathered to discuss local problems and solutions. An Ithaca, N.Y., group talked about a system of trading goods and services, using locally printed money. A speaker from the Movement for the Survival of the Ogoni people of Nigeria described how they are trying to halt oil exploration, which they say destroys Ogoni land. Speakers from Mexico discussed the negative consequences of the North American Free Trade Agreement and land reform.

The People's Summiteers are under no illusion that their work will have much immediate effect. "We are not waiting for the S-8 powers to change," said ecological economist Winifred Armstrong. "We are creating alternatives, making connections and building from there."

GRAPHIC: Picture, Participants at the People's Summit in Denver (Chris Anderson--Aurora for USN&WR)

Back to Table of Contents


The Nation
July 7, 1997
by Doug Henwood, the Editor of Left Business Observer:

Here is the last paragraph from an editorial on the G-7 Summit

As the worthies gather, so do their critics. A group calling itself The Other Economic Summit (TOES) has been shadowing the summiteers for the past twelve summits. They're a varied group, with critiques and counter programs ranging from sharp to New Agey. But what's most encouraging about TOES is that it's a mechanism for opponents of the neoliberal agenda from around the world to talk, think and bond - not just every June but year-round. (The Webbed can learn more about TOES by visiting http://pender.ee.upenn.edu/~rabii/toes/.) To use the clunky language of economists, this is a positive externality of the Summit Process.

Back to Table of Contents


Shukan ST, Tokyo, Japan
(a weekly newspaper published by the Japan Times for people studying English)
July 18, 1997, Friday

Biopiracy

by Douglas Lummis

As I wrote in my last column, I spent June 20-22 in Denver at The Other Economic Summit (TOES). TOES is held every year alongside the Economic Summit of the G-7 (now G-8) to protest the idea that this small group of rich males is the appropriate body to plan the world's economy.

One of the most powerful speakers at this year's TOES was Dr. Vandana Shiva, a physicist who abandoned her career with India's nuclear power industry to become and environmental researcher, writer and activist. She spoke on the notion of "intellectual property rights."

Recently the rich countries have been pressuring the Third World to accept the principle of intellectual property rights. Actually it isn't the countries that are putting on the pressure, but a coalition of transnational corporations (TNCs). What they want is the right to patent anything they say they have invented. In the age of biotechnology, this means the right to patent life forms so they can sell them as commodities under their brand names. (One of Dr. Shiva's books shows on the cover a butterfly with a bar code on its wing.)

For example, the TNCs want to be able to patent seeds they have produced through biotechnology. Traditionally farmers have used the seeds produced in their own fields (e.g., rice seeds). This means a farmer who bought the patented seed could supply herself with it the following year. The TNCs hope that with their new patents they can sue such farmers for "patent infringement."

Dr. Shiva points out that biotechnology does not create new genes, but only relocates them. "It is as if I brought an extra chair into this room, and then said: 'Now I own the room,'" she said.

Aside from biotechnology, the TNCs also sometimes take the knowledge that indigenous people have had for centuries, simply translate it into the language of modern science, and then say they have "invented" it.

An example Dr. Shiva used is the neem tree, native to India. For 2000 years the people -- mostly the women -- have prepared medicines and pesticides from neem oil. More recently small businesses have used it to manufacture products for sale. These were not patented because the techniques were considered common knowledge. For years Western scientists considered these techniques to be "unscientific," that is, not "real knowledge."

But since 1985 more than a dozen U.S. patents have been taken out for neem-based products. By making slight variations in the manufacturing technique, the corporations can claim to have "invented" neem-based medicine. Armedwith their U.S. patents, they hope to force people in India to stop making neem-based medicine using their traditional methods, by suing them for "patent infringement." To obtain neem, they will have to by it from the foreign TNCs. Dr. Shiva calls this "biopiracy." (To learn more, read Vandana Shiva, Biopiracy, Boston: South End Press, 1997.)

Back to Table of Contents


Go to TOES-USA Press

Go to Peoples' Summit - TOES '97 Home Page